What FOC 87 is, and the threshold every custody motion has to meet
Motion Regarding Custody (FOC 87) is one of the form motions the friend of the court office must make available under MCL 552.505(1)(d), for a party who wants to modify a custody order without a lawyer. The instructions say to use it if you have a pending case for custody, divorce, separate maintenance, family support or paternity, or if you have a custody order through a judgment of custody, divorce, separate maintenance, a family support order, or an order of filiation. They say it cannot be used to start a custody case, by a third party who wants to intervene to get custody in a pending case, or to change the child’s domicile to another state or more than 100 miles away; for that, they say to use this form and FOC 115.
A motion in an existing case follows MCR 2.119. MCR 3.213 says postjudgment motions in domestic relations actions are governed by MCR 2.119, and MCR 2.119(A)(1) says a motion must be in writing, state with particularity the grounds and authority on which it is based, state the relief or order sought, and be signed. The form’s items track that: what the current order says (items 1, 3 and 4), the grounds (items 5 and 6), any agreement (item 7), and the order you want (item 8).
The grounds come first. MCL 722.27(1)(c) lets the court modify or amend its previous judgments or orders for proper cause shown or because of change of circumstances, and says the court shall not change a child’s established custodial environment unless there is presented clear and convincing evidence that it is in the best interest of the child. In Vodvarka v Grasmeyer, 259 Mich App 499 (2003), the Court of Appeals held that the movant must prove proper cause or a change of circumstances by a preponderance of the evidence before the court considers the established custodial environment and the best interest factors.
Vodvarka defines both terms. Proper cause means one or more appropriate grounds, relevant to at least one of the twelve best interest factors, of such magnitude that they have or could have a significant effect on the child’s life. A change of circumstances means that, since the entry of the last custody order, the conditions surrounding custody, which have or could have a significant effect on the child’s well-being, have materially changed; the court said normal life changes are not enough and that the change must have occurred after the last custody order.
If the motion is contested, MCR 3.210(C)(8) says that in deciding whether an evidentiary hearing is needed on a postjudgment motion to change custody, the court must determine, by an offer of proof or otherwise, whether there are contested factual issues. When custody or a motion that would change the established custodial environment is contested, MCR 3.210(C)(1) says the hearing must be held within 56 days after the court orders it or after notice that a hearing is requested (or, if both parties agree to mediation and it is unsuccessful, within 56 days after the final mediation session), and MCR 3.210(C)(3) says the court must decide within 28 days after the hearing. MCR 3.210(C)(7) lets the court extend both times for good cause.