Moving Out of New Jersey With a Child
The removal statute, N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, and the best interests standard from Bisbing v. Bisbing
Researched by Dan Martin, Legal Researcher · Published by Onbello Legal
Quick answer
Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, children who are natives of New Jersey or have lived here five years may not be removed from the state without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, orders otherwise. In Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309 (2017), the Supreme Court held that cause is decided by a best interests analysis in all contested relocation cases where the parents share legal custody.
The statute
N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 applies when the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the custody and maintenance of the minor children of parents who are divorced, separated or living separate, and the children are natives of New Jersey or have resided five years within its limits. Those children shall not be removed out of the court’s jurisdiction against their own consent, if of suitable age to signify it, nor while under that age without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, orders otherwise. The court may also require security and issue writs to carry out the section.
The standard: best interests
Before 2017, New Jersey courts applied Baures v. Lewis, 167 N.J. 91 (2001), under which a parent with primary custody could relocate by showing a good-faith reason and that the move would not be inimical to the child’s interests. In Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309 (2017), the Supreme Court abandoned that standard and held that courts should conduct a best interests analysis to determine cause under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 in all contested relocation disputes in which the parents share legal custody, whether the arrangement names a parent of primary residence or provides for equally shared custody.
- The factors. The court considers all relevant factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), supplemented by other factors as appropriate. The Court noted that a number of the statutory factors will be directly relevant in typical relocation decisions.
- Changed circumstances. Where the custody arrangement was agreed to and incorporated in a judgment, the parent seeking to relocate must also demonstrate changed circumstances to justify modifying it.
- Evidence. The Court said the trial court may consider the views of both parents and other adults close to the child, documentary evidence, interviews with the children at the court’s discretion, and expert testimony.
Agreements not to relocate
How to ask for, or oppose, a move
- FD cases. The FD Application/Cross Application to Modify a Court Order (CN 11487) has an item for applying to relocate the children out of state, stating where and why, and for opposing a move and explaining why.
- FM cases. The Family Multi-Purpose Post Judgment Motion Packet (CN 10483) covers motions for relocation of a child and cross-motions opposing them.
- In a new case. Each parent’s Custody and Parenting Time/Visitation Plan must address the impact of any contemplated change of residence by a parent (R. 5:8-5(a)).
Emergencies
The Judiciary’s emergent hearing form (CN 11523) lists the temporary prevention of a child’s relocation outside New Jersey as an example of an issue for an order to show cause, and its emergent application includes boxes for threats to remove the child from New Jersey in violation of N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 and for a child already removed without consent. See the emergency relief guide.
If you already have a custody order from another state, the Judiciary can register and, if needed, enforce it. Its self-help page links the Certification and Request to Register/Enforce Out-of-State Custody/Parenting Time/Visitation Order (CN 11064) as the request form and lists a $35 filing fee.
Primary sources
Rules and forms change. Check the current version at the source before you file. New Jersey statutes are published by the Legislature, and the Rules Governing the Courts by the Judiciary. Neither site offers a stable link to a single section, so statute and Court Rule links open the official search page; search there for the citation shown.
- N.J.S.A. 9:2-2, removal of children from the state
- N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, custody factors
- Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309 (2017)
- R. 5:8-5, custody and parenting time/visitation plans
- CN 11487, request to modify an FD court order
- CN 10483, Family Multi-Purpose Post Judgment Motion Packet
- CN 11523, Emergent Hearing (Order to Show Cause)
- CN 11064, Certification and Request to Register/Enforce Out-of-State Custody/Parenting Time/Visitation Order
- NJ Courts, child support and custody self-help
Common questions
Can I move out of New Jersey with my child?
N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 says children who are natives of New Jersey, or who have lived in the state for five years, may not be removed from the court's jurisdiction without the consent of both parents (and of the child, if of suitable age to signify it), unless the court, upon cause shown, orders otherwise. In Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309 (2017), the Supreme Court held that in contested relocation cases where the parents share legal custody, cause is decided by a best interests analysis under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.
Keep going with the free guides
Our filing tool prepares California court paperwork today, and other states are coming. Use the guides, form walkthroughs and free tools here now, and join the waitlist to hear when your state opens.
Join the waitlistA family law attorney will always have the biggest impact on your case. If you can afford one, we encourage you to hire one.